Case 2600125/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Owen v Ashfield Effluent Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600125/2021
- Decision date
- 25 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Butler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Owen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy an order dated 16 April 2021, the Tribunal gave Mrs A Owen an opportunity to explain why the claims should not be struck out on the basis that they had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that she did not make any sufficient representations in response.
The Tribunal therefore struck out both the constructive unfair dismissal claim and the sex discrimination claim. No substantive liability findings were made on either claim; the judgment is a strike-out decision only.
The hearing listed for 8, 9 and 10 August 2022 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment refers to the claim as 'constructive unfair dismissal' and states that it was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The sex discrimination claim was struck out after the Claimant failed to make sufficient representations in response to the Tribunal's order dated 16 April 2021. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.