Case 2600129/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Hussain v Mach Recruitment Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600129/2022
- Decision date
- 20 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend the hearing. After the tribunal office attempted to contact the respondent and noted the respondent had not given notice of non-attendance, the hearing proceeded in the respondent's absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claimant was employed by Mach Recruitment Limited as a warehouse operative placed with the Very Group from 1 August 2021 to 7 September 2021. It found that he worked 38.5 hours per week at £10.25 per hour and had not been paid for the shift weeks 10 to 13 August, 18 to 21 August, and 26 to 29 August 2021.
The tribunal concluded that the claimant suffered unauthorised deductions from wages in August and September 2021 and ordered the respondent to pay £1,183.88.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found unauthorised deductions from wages in August and September 2021 and ordered a single grand total payment. | Upheld | — | £1,184 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,184
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.