Case 2600134/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Sheppard v Bulldog Security Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600134/2022
- Decision date
- 6 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Sheppard
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 6 June 2022, Employment Judge Ahmed sat alone at Leicester and the respondent did not appear or have representation. The tribunal made orders in favour of Mrs C Sheppard for £11,188.80 net for unlawful deduction of wages and £1,008.00 net for outstanding holiday pay.
The tribunal also found that Mrs C Sheppard was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,512.00 and ordered Bulldog Security Ltd to pay £1,008.00 net under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide particulars of employment required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested; the total monetary awards recorded in the judgment were £14,716.80.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered Bulldog Security Ltd to pay £11,188.80 net in respect of an unlawful deduction of wages. | Upheld | — | £11,189 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,008.00 net in respect of a failure to pay outstanding holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £1,008 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,512.00. | Upheld | — | £1,512 |
| Other | Pursuant to section 38 Employment Act 2002, the tribunal ordered £1,008.00 net for failure to provide particulars of employment required by section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,008 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,717
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 38 Employment Act 2002
- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.