Case 2600135/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600135/2022
- Decision date
- 6 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fredericks Appearances
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Adat brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Tesco Stores Limited. The case was heard in Nottingham on 6 June 2022 before Employment Judge Fredericks, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Miss E Wheeler of counsel.
The tribunal held that the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
The judgment records that full reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested in writing within 14 days of the sending of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint as not well-founded. The judgment states that full reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in writing within 14 days. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.