Case 2600136/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Foho v Derby City Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600136/2023
- Decision date
- 27 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Foho
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim(s) because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 11 January 2024. A further letter dated 11 June 2024 warned that failure to reply could lead to strike out on the basis that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal found that the claimant had failed to make representations in writing, or had failed to make sufficient representations, as to why strike out should not follow, and had not requested a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out.
The hearing listed for 27 to 30 August 2024 did not take place. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims or any award of remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment strikes out the claim and does not break out the outcome by individual allegation. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment strikes out the claim and does not break out the outcome by individual allegation. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment strikes out the claim and does not break out the outcome by individual allegation. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.