Case 2600137/2024 · Employment Tribunal
J Galpin v Yu Energy — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600137/2024
- Decision date
- 26 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Welch
Parties
2 namedClaimant
J Galpin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 May 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 17 January 2024, had not actively pursued the case, and had failed to attend the private preliminary hearing by telephone on 22 April 2024.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Welch ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment also records that the hearing fixed for 23, 24 and 25 June 2025 would not take place. No substantive liability findings or remedy awards are recorded in the extract.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim for non-compliance with an order dated 17 January 2024, lack of active pursuit, and failure to attend the private preliminary hearing on 22 April 2024. The extract does not specify the underlying pleaded causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.