Case 2600144/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Carlile v Carol Knight c/o Henri Beene — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600144/2023
- Decision date
- 24 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McTigue Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Carlile
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr W Carlile brought claims against Carol Knight c/o Henri Beene for unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract. The case was heard remotely at Nottingham on 24 April 2023 before Employment Judge McTigue, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal held that the respondent did not make an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages in breach of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so that claim was not well founded and was dismissed. The separate breach of contract complaint was also found not well founded and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were provided in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent did not make an unauthorised deduction from wages in breach of section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint was found not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.