Case 2600146/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Simon Hedley v Birds (Derby) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600146/2023
- Decision date
- 24 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Simon Hedley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Simon Hedley was employed by Birds (Derby) Limited as an Area Manager from 31 October 2022. He attended induction on his first day, then was absent from work from 2 November 2022 onwards. The tribunal accepted evidence that the respondent had been told before the first interview that his mother had died, but that on 2 November he texted to say she had been rushed into hospital, and that over the next two weeks the respondent received several contradictory texts. He did not attend the meeting arranged for 22 November 2022 and had no further contact after 14 November 2022.
The tribunal found that the respondent sent him a payslip, P45 and payment for two days' work amounting to £246.15. It held that he had only worked one day, but had been paid for two days, and that during the period of absence he failed to keep in touch with his employer. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that he had not suffered any unlawful deduction from wages. It also found that he had not produced evidence of any expenses said to be due.
On the contract claim, the tribunal found no breach. It noted that the claimant had not signed his contract of employment and was only entitled to statutory notice pay. As he had been employed for less than one month, he was not entitled to notice. The tribunal also found that he was not entitled to any payment under the company's compassionate leave or bereavement arrangements, and that there were no other entitlements due under the terms of his contract. Both claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant worked only on the first day of employment, had been paid for two days' work (£246.15), and was absent without leave for the rest of the period. It also noted that he had not provided evidence of any expenses or other sums said to be due. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found no breach of contract. It held the claimant had not signed the contract, was only entitled to statutory notice pay, and because he had been employed for less than one month he was not entitled to notice. It also found no entitlement under the company's bereavement policy or other procedures. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.