Case 2600154/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Rice v Real Bars Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600154/2022
- Decision date
- 27 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phillips
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Rice
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Phillips sat alone at Nottingham on 27 May 2022. The tribunal found that Mrs K Rice was redundant and ordered Real Bars Limited to pay redundancy pay in the gross sum of £801.90.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had unlawfully deducted from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,176.12 gross for wages. No separate apportionment of the awards was given beyond those stated sums.
The claim for holiday pay was found not well founded and was dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was redundant and ordered redundancy pay in the gross sum of £801.90. | Upheld | — | £802 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found there had been an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,176.12 gross for wages. | Upheld | — | £1,176 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for holiday pay was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,978
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.