Case 2600162/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Needham v National Fundraising Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600162/2022
- Decision date
- 20 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Needham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 25 January 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,260 gross in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in relation to notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £360 for that breach.
The hearing listed for 20 May 2022 was cancelled. The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Adkinson on 12 April 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,260 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,260 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £360. | Upheld | — | £360 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,620
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.