Case 2600163/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Revel v Lincolnshire Road Car Company Ltd (t/a Stagecoach East Midlands) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600163/2022
- Decision date
- 17 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Revel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Revel’s unfair dismissal claim against Lincolnshire Road Car Company Ltd (t/a Stagecoach East Midlands) was not determined on the merits. The tribunal found that the claim had been presented outside the time limit in section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996 and that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. The unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
The disability discrimination claim was also not determined on the merits. The tribunal found that it had been presented outside the time limit in section 123 Equality Act 2010 and that it was not just and equitable to extend time. That claim was likewise dismissed for want of jurisdiction. No monetary award was made.
The hearing was at Nottingham on 17 June 2022 before Employment Judge Victoria Butler. The claimant did not attend; the respondent was represented by a legal consultant. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented outside the time limit in section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented in time, so it was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Presented outside the time limit in section 123 Equality Act 2010; the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time, so it was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.