Case 2600174/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Murray v Dermal Diagnostics Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2600174/2025
- Decision date
- 24 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Murray
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss K Murray brought a claim against Dermal Diagnostics. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge recorded that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, the tribunal found that she was entitled to a redundancy payment.
The only monetary figure recorded in the judgment is a redundancy payment of £2,079.21. No further findings, separate heads of loss, or additional remedies are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £2079.21. No separate breakdown or additional claim outcome is recorded. | Upheld | — | £2,079 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,079
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.