Case 2600177/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Plaats v Ottimo Restaurant — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600177/2023
- Decision date
- 15 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Plaats
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The claim was issued on 21 January 2023, and the tribunal recorded that the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim in accordance with rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and found that the respondent must pay the claimant £92 gross. It also upheld the claim for accrued holiday pay and ordered payment of £107.92.
The total sum ordered to be paid to the claimant was £199.92. No other remedy components were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £92 gross. | Upheld | — | £92 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay accrued holiday pay and ordered payment of £107.92. | Upheld | — | £108 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.