Case 2600178/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Shreeve v New Standard Club and Institute — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600178/2024
- Decision date
- 23 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Shreeve
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Shreeve's claim was determined under rule 21 after New Standard Club and Institute failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Victoria Butler decided the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined on that basis and found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, awarding gross damages of £874.28.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £655.71. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £166.72 for that item. The total payable was £1,696.71.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded as gross damages for notice. | Upheld | — | £874 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £656 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £167 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,697
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.