Case 2600180/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Niculae v I M Knitwear Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2600180/2025
- Decision date
- 7 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Niculae
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss N Niculae brought the claim against I M Knitwear Limited, and the judgment records that it was presented in the Midlands East Employment Tribunal on 7 April 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time.
Employment Judge Adkinson determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. The judgment does not set out any substantive defence or factual dispute from the respondent.
The tribunal recorded that the claim succeeds. Remedy was not determined in this judgment and was left to a separate Remedy Hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time and that, under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure, a determination could properly be made of the claim or part of it. The claim was successful, and remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.