Case 2600184/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Langton v Cleggs Limited Mark K Williams Limited Ian Torr Limited Jane Burton Limited Mike Sullivan Limited Nelsons Solicitors Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600184/2024
- Decision date
- 11 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Midlands East by CVP on 10 September 2024 before Employment Judge Brewer, the tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims in case 2600184/2024 were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment names six respondents: Cleggs Limited, Mark K Williams Limited, Ian Torr Limited, Jane Burton Limited, Mike Sullivan Limited and Nelsons Solicitors Limited.
The written record does not set out separate liability findings on the pleaded heads of claim and does not identify any monetary remedy. It simply records the withdrawal outcome across the case.
The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment records that the claims in case 2600184/2024 were dismissed on withdrawal; it does not give a claim-by-claim breakdown. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment records that the claims in case 2600184/2024 were dismissed on withdrawal; it does not give a claim-by-claim breakdown. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that the claims in case 2600184/2024 were dismissed on withdrawal; it does not give a claim-by-claim breakdown. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment records that the claims in case 2600184/2024 were dismissed on withdrawal; it does not give a claim-by-claim breakdown. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written judgment records that the claims in case 2600184/2024 were dismissed on withdrawal; it does not give a claim-by-claim breakdown. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.