Case 2600188/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs TE Herbert v York House Limited (formerly in Administration, now dissolved) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600188/2017
- Decision date
- 20 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs TE Herbert
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 24 June 2019, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing explaining why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive findings on the merits of any underlying complaint and no monetary remedy was awarded.
The reasons also note that the respondent company was dissolved in 2018 and had not, so far as the tribunal was aware, been restored to the company register, meaning it no longer technically existed at the time of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that 'the claim' was struck out for not having been actively pursued. It does not identify the underlying substantive claim types in the reasons. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.