Case 2600194/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Randall v Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600194/2020
- Decision date
- 6 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Randall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ahmed, sitting alone at Nottingham on 6 January 2022, granted the claimant relief from sanctions. The judgment records that this allowed Miss T Randall to proceed with her complaint of disability discrimination against Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.
No substantive determination of the disability discrimination complaint was made in this short judgment. The tribunal recorded only that case management directions would be issued separately.
The written record also states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days. The decision therefore resolves the procedural application only, not the merits of the underlying discrimination claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal granted relief from sanctions and permitted the claimant to proceed with her complaint of disability discrimination. This was a procedural decision and no substantive liability finding on the discrimination complaint was made in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.