Case 2600200/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Popat v Gohil International Procurement Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600200/2023
- Decision date
- 12 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Popat
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ahmed, sitting alone at Leicester by CVP on 12 May 2023, recorded that the respondent's name was amended to Gohil International Procurement Services Ltd. The judgment did not decide the merits of the claim.
Instead, it records that the parties had reached agreement in principle through ACAS. The hearing was adjourned for 28 days. The Claimant was told she could apply to have the hearing restored after that period if there was any difficulty with the agreement.
The judgment further states that, if payment of the agreed sum is made, the Claimant should inform the Tribunal as soon as possible and the claim is to be withdrawn. No final monetary award or liability finding is recorded in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment did not determine the substantive claim. It records that the parties had reached agreement in principle through ACAS and adjourned the hearing for 28 days, with the Claimant to withdraw the claim once payment of the agreed sum is made, or to apply to restore the hearing if there is difficulty with the agreement. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.