Case 2600202/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs T Warman v ECO Cleaning Services — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600202/2021
- Decision date
- 15 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Victoria Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs T Warman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, in a judgment dated 15 June 2021, struck out Mrs T Warman's claim against Eco Cleaning Services because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant had been given an opportunity by letter dated 29 May 2021 to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The Tribunal found that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out. The judgment records no substantive determination of the merits of the underlying dispute.
Because the claim was struck out at this stage, the hearing fixed for 29 June 2021 did not take place. The judgment does not record any monetary award or any separate remedy assessment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify the underlying contractual issue. It records that, by letter dated 29 May 2021, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on whether the claim should be struck out for not having been actively pursued. No sufficient representations were made, so the claim was struck out and the hearing listed for 29 June 2021 did not take place. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.