Case 2600209/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. M Khan v DHL Aviation UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600209/2023
- Decision date
- 9 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. M Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 9 May 2023 the Tribunal sent orders giving Mr. M Khan an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, as to why the remainder of the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, that he had not complied with Tribunal orders, and that it had not been actively pursued.
The judgment records that Mr. Khan failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not follow, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Heap struck out the claim.
The extracted text does not set out any substantive liability findings on the underlying claim heads, and no financial remedy was awarded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive claim heads; it records only that the claim was struck out after the Claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.