Case 2600215/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Gaiqui v Wellcomm Health & Fitness Nottingham Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600215/2023
- Decision date
- 6 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Gaiqui
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge, sitting alone, recorded that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,169.00 net. The tribunal also ordered notice pay of £313.82 net and holiday pay of £270 net.
The tribunal further recorded that the respondent failed to follow the ACAS Code of Conduct in relation to disciplinary and grievance procedures and applied a 10% uplift to the sums ordered. The judgment states the uplifted base as £1,752.21 and the final total as £1,928.03, although the printed component figures do not fully reconcile exactly with that base figure.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment also recorded a 10% ACAS uplift on the total sum, but the printed component figures, uplift base, and final total do not fully reconcile. | Upheld | — | £1,169 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £314 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £270 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,928
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ACAS Code of Conduct
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.