Case 2600221/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Tasker v Bonmarche Limited (In Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600221/2020
- Decision date
- 22 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Tasker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss E Tasker's claim against Bonmarche Limited (In Administration). The judgment records that the tribunal had written to the claimant on 29/08/2020 giving her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out.
The stated reasons for considering strike out were that the claimant had not responded to the tribunal's letter dated 27/01/2020 and that the claim was not being actively pursued. The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing, and the claim was therefore struck out. The judgment does not record any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying legal basis of the claim; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.