Case 2600221/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Anna Achilleos v Green Oak Surveyors Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600221/2024
- Decision date
- 5 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Anna Achilleos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunal on 29 January 2024. The Respondent failed to present a valid response, and Employment Judge Ahmed determined the case under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The Claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal by reason of having made a protected disclosure, detriment for having made a protected disclosure, and breach of contract (wrongful dismissal) all succeeded.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant a total of £30,289.39. This comprised damages for breach of contract of £10,238.10, loss of earnings of £11,590.39, pension loss of £288.90, loss of car allowance of £2,725.00, professional fees of £447.00, and damages for injury to feelings of £5,000.00.
The judgment provides no further reasoning on the underlying facts beyond confirming the claims succeeded under Rule 21 and setting out the monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatically unfair dismissal by reason of having made a protected disclosure. Determined under Rule 21 after the Respondent failed to present a valid response. | Upheld | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Detriment for having made a protected disclosure. Injury to feelings award of £5,000 attributed to this claim. | Upheld | — | £5,000 |
| Breach of contract | Wrongful dismissal / breach of contract. Damages of £10,238.10. | Upheld | — | £10,238 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £30,289
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £15,051
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.