Case 2600236/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jie Ru v Ottimo Restaurants Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600236/2023
- Decision date
- 4 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jie Ru
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Midlands East Employment Tribunals on 20 February 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge made a Rule 21 determination on the papers.
The tribunal found that Ottimo Restaurants Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr Jie Ru's wages and ordered the respondent to pay £220.00 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £100.00.
The judgment records a total award of £320.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £220.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £220 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £100.00. | Upheld | — | £100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £320
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.