Case 2600249/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E J Czerniak v Broxtowe Borough Council — 2018
- Case reference
- 2600249/2019
- Decision date
- 27 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E J Czerniak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Czerniak brought claims including unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, disability discrimination and failure to make reasonable adjustments, but this hearing was confined to a preliminary issue about disability. The tribunal accepted that he was already disabled by reason of cancer, and considered whether atrial fibrillation, stress/anxiety, a back injury and a TIA, separately or cumulatively, also met the statutory definition. Where the claimant's oral evidence differed from his GP notes, the judge preferred the contemporaneous medical records.
On atrial fibrillation, the tribunal found that the condition was asymptomatic when diagnosed in September 2016 and remained recorded in follow-up consultations as doing well, with nil issues or no symptoms. The brief lethargy caused by Atenolol led to a change of medication, but the later notes recorded no ongoing adverse effects and no limitation on normal day-to-day activities. The tribunal therefore held that AF was not a disability.
The back injury arose after a cycling accident in October 2017 and caused pain and reduced mobility for around four to five months. By March 2018 the notes described the claimant as active and keen to improve further, and later records showed him walking five to six miles a day and doing gardening and DIY. The tribunal accepted there had been an adverse effect, but held that it was not long-term and that there was no evidence of likely recurrence.
On stress, the tribunal accepted there may have been work-related stress from March 2017 until employment ended in July 2018, but found very limited evidence of any effect on normal day-to-day activities beyond loss of appetite and some sleep disturbance. It treated the stress as a reaction to adverse life events rather than a qualifying impairment under the Act. The TIA was conceded not to be long-term, and the tribunal concluded that none of the alleged impairments, individually or together, amounted to a disability for the purposes of s.6 Equality Act 2010.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal held that none of the claimant's alleged impairments, alone or cumulatively, amounted to a disability within s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v Patent Office four questions
- Cruickshank v Vaw Motorcast Ltd
- Rugamer v Sony Music Entertainment UK Ltd
- College of Ripon and York St John v Hobbs
- McNicol v Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance Ltd
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5(1) Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2 Equality Act 2010
- J v DLA Piper
- Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Council
- EHRC Guidance B4-B5
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.