Case 2600249/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I D Holmes v Forterra Building Products Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600249/2020
- Decision date
- 5 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I D Holmes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Batten recorded that Mr I D Holmes was unfairly dismissed by Forterra Building Products Limited. The judgment does not set out further reasons or factual findings in the extracted text, but it does state the claim outcome plainly and records that the hearing listed for 2 May 2020 was cancelled.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay compensation of £21,521.15. That sum was broken down into a basic award of £15,669.60 and a compensatory award of £5,851.55.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded compensation in a total sum of £21,521.15, made up of a basic award of £15,669.60 and a compensatory award of £5,851.55. | Upheld | — | £21,521 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,521
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £15,670
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £5,852
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.