Case 2600256/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Manole v Alliance Healthcare Management Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600256/2024
- Decision date
- 2 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Welch REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Manole
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing held in public, the tribunal determined that the claimant's complaint described as a health and safety violation had no reasonable prospect of success and struck it out under rule 37(1)(a).
The claimant's indirect disability discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. The tribunal directed that the remaining claims, namely unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, holiday pay, direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment related to disability, victimisation and unlawful deductions from wages, should continue to a final hearing.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing. No written reasons were provided in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers to a 'complaint of health & safety violation', which does not map cleanly onto the locked taxonomy. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the indirect disability discrimination claim was 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.