Case 2600260/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Jones v Landscape Event Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2600260/2024
- Decision date
- 3 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Nottingham by CVP on 18 February 2025 before Employment Judge M Butler sitting alone. The Claimant appeared in person; the Respondent did not attend and was not represented. The Tribunal issued judgment in the Claimant's favour on three monetary claims.
The Tribunal found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,778.84 net. It also found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant's accrued holiday pay, ordering £404.28 net, and had failed to pay notice pay, ordering a further £404.28 net. The total award to the Claimant is £2,587.40.
The judgment as available is brief and does not set out detailed reasons or named legal tests; the document indicates that reasons were sent to the parties on 3 March 2025.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £1,779 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the Respondent failed to pay accrued holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £404 |
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found the Respondent failed to pay notice pay; classified as breach of contract. | Upheld | — | £404 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,587
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.