Case 2600261/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Hollick For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600261/2019
- Decision date
- 7 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Hollick For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open attended preliminary hearing on 1 October 2019 before Employment Judge Jeram sitting alone, the Tribunal dealt with the unfair dismissal claims in the multiple claim brought by Mr L Hollick and others against Engie Services Ltd. The claimants were represented by Mr Hollick and the respondent by Ms Ballmelli of Counsel.
The Tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claims presented by Mr Sam Roe and Mr David Owen. The reason given was that each of them had not been continuously employed for a period of not less than two years ending with the effective date of termination, so they did not satisfy the qualifying period for an unfair dismissal claim.
The unfair dismissal claims presented by Mr Hollick and Ms Green were allowed to proceed to a final hearing. The order records that all issues in the case, including remedy, were to be determined at that later hearing, with further case management directions made about availability dates, disclosure, the issues list, compensation schedules, bundles, and witness statements.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim presented by Mr Sam Roe. The Tribunal dismissed the claim at an open attended preliminary hearing because he had not been continuously employed for a period of not less than 2 years ending with the effective date of termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim presented by Mr David Owen. The Tribunal dismissed the claim at an open attended preliminary hearing because he had not been continuously employed for a period of not less than 2 years ending with the effective date of termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- 2 years' continuous employment requirement
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.