Case 2600266/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Wright v Strawberry Fields — 2025
- Case reference
- 2600266/2025
- Decision date
- 17 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Chapman
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Wright
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Nottingham on 2 July 2025 before Employment Judge S Chapman sitting alone. The claimant, Ms K Wright, did not attend. The respondent attended through Rachel Beard, a litigant in person.
The tribunal recorded that it made enquiries about the reason for the claimant’s absence and considered the information available to it. It then dismissed the claim pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
No substantive findings on the underlying breach of contract or unfair dismissal issues are set out in the judgment. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed pursuant to rule 47 after the claimant did not attend the hearing on 2 July 2025; the judgment does not record separate merits findings on this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed pursuant to rule 47 after the claimant did not attend the hearing on 2 July 2025; the judgment does not record separate merits findings on this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.