Case 2600305/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Veni v Mr D Udall — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600305/2020
- Decision date
- 14 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Veni
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response and did not attend the hearing. In default, Employment Judge Postle found the claimant's claims were well founded and made monetary orders on each head of claim addressed in the judgment.
The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered repayment of £706.68. It also found that the claimant was made redundant on 14 November 2019 without notice, which was treated as a breach of contract, and awarded £1,260 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £945. It also found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered £2,205. A further £750 was ordered in relation to goods the claimant could not recover after the landlords took possession of the respondent's premises.
The written record does not identify any discrimination issue, lay members, or legal test beyond the default position. The awards in the judgment total £5,866.68.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £706.68 for an unauthorised deduction of wages. | Upheld | — | £707 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant was made redundant on 14 November 2019 without any notice, which the tribunal found to be a breach of contract and awarded £1,260 in damages. | Upheld | — | £1,260 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £945. | Upheld | — | £945 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,205. | Upheld | — | £2,205 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered £750 for goods the claimant was unable to recover after the landlords took possession of the respondent's premises; the judgment does not label this head of claim more specifically. | Upheld | — | £750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,867
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.