Case 2600305/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Stirland v Personnel Solutions (Midlands) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600305/2021
- Decision date
- 10 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Stirland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Leicester hearing on 10 June 2021, Employment Judge Adkinson sitting alone found that Personnel Solutions (Midlands) Limited dismissed Mr A Stirland and that the dismissal was unfair. The tribunal ordered a basic award of £1,076 and a compensatory award of £350 for loss of statutory rights.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had not paid all of the claimant's notice pay and ordered payment of £625. The claimant's breach of contract claim for unpaid commission was dismissed.
The holiday pay claim was dismissed because the claimant had withdrawn it.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair. It ordered a basic award of £1,076 and a compensatory award of £350 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £1,426 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found that the respondent had not paid all of the claimant's notice pay and ordered payment of £625. | Upheld | — | £625 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's claim that the respondent had breached his contract by not paying commission was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim was dismissed because the claimant withdrew it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,051
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,076
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £350
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.