Case 2600306/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Katherine Paling v IntraHealth — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600306/2024
- Decision date
- 25 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ahmed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Katherine Paling
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy two letters dated 7 March 2024, the Tribunal gave Mrs Katherine Paling an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims of unfair dismissal and redundancy should not be struck out. The Tribunal recorded that those claims appeared to have no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant did not have the two-year qualifying period needed to bring them.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out both the unfair dismissal and redundancy claims. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the Tribunal considered the claim to have no reasonable prospect of success given the claimant did not have the two-year qualifying period. The claimant did not make written representations, make sufficient representations, or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letters dated 7 March 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | Struck out on the same basis as the unfair dismissal claim: no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant did not have the two-year qualifying period, and no sufficient representations or hearing request were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.