Case 2600311/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Farmer v ACI Retail Finance Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2600311/2021
- Decision date
- 9 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Farmer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 liability and remedy judgment after the respondent failed to enter a response. The tribunal therefore held that the claim succeeded. The claim before the tribunal was for holiday pay, notice pay and redundancy pay, and the claimant had provided a detailed breakdown of the sums claimed.
The tribunal declared that the claimant was entitled to 2 weeks unpaid notice pay and 19 days accrued leave. It awarded holiday pay of £2,046.11 gross, unpaid notice pay of £868.30 net, and a redundancy payment of £1,614 net. The judgment records that the recoupment provisions do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 liability and remedy judgment. Tribunal found the claimant entitled to 19 days accrued leave and awarded £2,046.11 gross holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £2,046 |
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 liability and remedy judgment. Tribunal awarded two weeks unpaid notice pay at £868.30 net. | Upheld | — | £868 |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 liability and remedy judgment. Tribunal awarded a redundancy payment of £1,614 net. | Upheld | — | £1,614 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,528
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.