Case 2600318/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S L Gray v Creative Crafting World Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600318/2023
- Decision date
- 27 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Welch
- Panel members
- Mr K Rose, Ms K McLeod
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S L Gray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Welch sat with lay members Mr K Rose and Ms K McLeod at Leicester, remotely via CVP, on 21, 24, 25 and 27 June 2024. The tribunal unanimously dismissed Mrs S L Gray's complaint of unfair dismissal (constructive), her complaint of discrimination arising from disability, and her complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so this document records the outcomes but not the tribunal's full reasoning. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment labels this complaint as 'Unfair dismissal (constructive)'. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of discrimination arising from disability. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.