Case 2600319/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Sonya Nicol v Ministry of Defence — 2025
- Case reference
- 2600319/2024
- Decision date
- 6 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson Members
- Venue
- Lincoln Heard
- Panel members
- Ms J Hallam, Mr C Goldson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Sonya Nicol
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a Physiotherapist Specialist employed by the Ministry of Defence, brought a disability discrimination claim alleging failure to make reasonable adjustments during a temporary move from RAF Cranwell to RAF Waddington. The respondent accepted that the claimant was disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010, that it knew of the disability, and that it had not provided the rise/fall desk or trolley bag during the relevant period.
For the trolley, the tribunal found that although Occupational Health had recommended a suitable trolley for carrying a heavy laptop, the claimant had said she did not need one, later obtained her own trolley, and did not tell the respondent that it was broken. The tribunal also found the trolley would only have been needed on a limited basis because the claimant was not expected to work from home or at other premises, and storage was available at Waddington.
For the desk, the tribunal found there had been no Occupational Health recommendation for a standing or rising desk; the earlier recommendation was for a larger desk. Although it was expected that the claimant's desk would be moved and the respondent accepted that it was not, the tribunal found no evidence that the lack of the desk caused substantial disadvantage, and noted that the claimant did not raise the issue before bringing the claim. The tribunal concluded that the claimant had not established substantial disadvantage from the failure to provide either auxiliary aid, so the claims failed and were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim was for failure to make reasonable adjustments by providing auxiliary aids: a trolley bag and a rise/fall or high/low desk. The respondent accepted disability and knowledge, and accepted the aids were not provided during the relevant period, but the tribunal found no substantial disadvantage. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Section 6(1) Equality Act 2010
- sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- section 20(5) Equality Act 2010
- Glasson v The Insolvency Service EAT 2022 00566/LA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.