Case 2600331/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Corby v Carlton Cleaning UK Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2600331/2020
- Decision date
- 14 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Corby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint. It recorded that Miss D Corby had been employed by Carlton Cleaning UK Ltd for less than two years, and therefore did not satisfy the qualifying service required to bring an unfair dismissal claim under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out, but the tribunal found that she did not give an acceptable reason. On that basis, the complaint of unfair dismissal was struck out.
The judgment expressly states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant had been employed for less than two years, so she was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under section 108 ERA 1996. She was given an opportunity to explain why the complaint should not be struck out but did not provide an acceptable reason. The judgment states that the claimant's other complaints were not affected. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.