Case 2600336/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Rana v B&M Print and Embroidery Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2600336/2025
- Decision date
- 29 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Adkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Rana
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Adkinson, sitting alone at Leicester Hearing Centre on 22 September 2025, heard the claim brought by Mrs S Rana against B&M Print and Embroidery Limited. The respondent's response had been rejected as presented late and the respondent had not applied for permission to present a response out of time or to take part, and was therefore debarred from taking part in the hearing. The Tribunal heard from the claimant in person and considered the evidence she presented.
The Tribunal was satisfied that the claimant's gross weekly pay was £1,197.91 and that she had been employed by the respondent for 6 years immediately before dismissal. The Tribunal held that the respondent had unfairly dismissed the claimant and that the dismissal was by reason of redundancy, entitling her to a redundancy payment of £4,200 gross. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay 6 weeks' notice pay (£7,187.46 gross) and 2 days' accrued holiday pay (£479.16 gross) due at dismissal.
The Tribunal also found that the respondent had made deductions from the claimant's pay described as pension contributions but had not in fact paid those sums into the claimant's pension, and that these deductions were therefore unauthorised; the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £3,694.95 gross in respect of those deductions. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Tribunal found the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant. No separate monetary award for unfair dismissal is itemised in the judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed because they were redundant and entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,200 gross. | Upheld | — | £4,200 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay of 6 weeks (£7,187.46 gross) awarded for failure to pay contractual notice. | Upheld | — | £7,187 |
| Holiday pay | 2 days' accrued paid leave at time of dismissal, £479.16 gross. | Upheld | — | £479 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Deductions taken as purported pension contributions but not paid into the claimant's pension; held to be unauthorised. £3,694.95 gross. | Upheld | — | £3,695 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,562
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.