Case 2600343/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Andersson v Norwood Electrical (UK) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600343/2022
- Decision date
- 27 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heathcote
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Andersson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Nottingham on 27 May 2022 before Employment Judge Heathcote sitting alone. Neither party entered an appearance at the hearing. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr L Andersson, brought claims against Norwood Electrical (UK) Ltd for an unauthorised deduction from wages and breach of contract.
The tribunal dismissed both claims. No separate remedy was awarded, and the written record does not set out any monetary findings beyond dismissal of the claims. The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.