Case 2600344/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P R Butcher v Fit For Purpose Solutions Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600344/2023
- Decision date
- 19 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Broughton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P R Butcher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 14 February 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that the claim, or part of it, could properly be decided under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims for a redundancy payment, unfair dismissal, notice pay and holiday succeeded. No reasons beyond the Rule 21 default basis are given in the extracted text, and no liability dispute is set out in the judgment text supplied.
The remedy was not fixed in this judgment. The tribunal stated that the claimant's entitlement would be determined at a Remedy Hearing, and the hearing listed for 27 June 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to 'notice pay' rather than using a statutory label; this has been mapped to breach of contract. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to 'holiday' rather than specifying the exact statutory basis; this has been mapped to holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.