Ms T Doil v Proman Managed Services Limited and 1 other — 2025

The tribunal considered the sole issue of whether the claimant met the definition of disabled within s.6 Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time by reason of cervical spondylosis. It reviewed the claimant's evidence, contemporaneous documents, and the respondents' submissions.

The tribunal found that the claimant had a physical impairment, cervical spondylosis, and that the condition was long term. However, it found no reliable evidence that the impairment affected the claimant's ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities, no reliable evidence that any adverse effect was substantial, and no evidence that any earlier substantial adverse effect had recurred or was likely to recur.

For those reasons, the tribunal held that at the relevant times the claimant was not disabled by reason of cervical spondylosis. The judgment did not make any monetary award.