Case 2600376/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Jordan v Salvador Deli — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600376/2019
- Decision date
- 17 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Jordan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 default judgment issued under the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal recorded that the claim succeeded, but the short template judgment did not set out the underlying facts, reasoning, or the specific pleaded cause(s) of action. The only named parties were Miss C Jordan and Salvador Deli, and the judge was Employment Judge Swann.
The judgment stated that the remedy to which the claimant was entitled would be determined at a Remedy Hearing. No compensation figure or other monetary award was recorded in this document.
The hearing listed on 17 May 2019 was cancelled. The extracted text does not identify any legal test, panel members, or discrimination characteristic, and it does not separate the outcome by individual claim type.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment: the claim succeeds. The extracted text does not specify the underlying cause(s) of action beyond the separate GOV.UK listing categories. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.