Case 2600388/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Rylott v Arggen 1 Ltd T/a Dentcare 1 Smile — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600388/2019
- Decision date
- 13 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Britton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Rylott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 Employment Tribunal judgment dated 13 August 2019 in case 2600388/2019, Miss J Rylott v Arggen 1 Ltd T/a Dentcare 1 Smile. The extracted text is the universal template and does not set out the underlying factual allegations or the legal basis of the claim.
The tribunal recorded that the claim succeeds. No substantive reasons, findings of fact, or legal tests are set out in the extracted text.
The judgment also states that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing, the notice of which accompanies the judgment. No monetary award is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment is a Rule 21 universal template and does not identify the specific substantive claim type(s); it states only that 'the claim succeeds' and that remedy will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.