Case 2600389/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Darko Mattocks v Sunco Knitwear Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 2600389/2024
- Decision date
- 25 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Adkinson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Darko Mattocks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge recorded that the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment was therefore made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, and the tribunal decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim or part of it on that basis.
The judgment states that the claim succeeds. It does not set out the substantive claim type or types in the extracted text, and it does not assess remedy, because the remedy to which the claimant is entitled was left to be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. All currently listed hearings were cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive cause or causes of action; it only states that the claim succeeds under Rule 21 and that remedy will be determined later. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.