Case 2600404/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Biddulph v Inspire Bounce Fitness Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600404/2019
- Decision date
- 9 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Biddulph
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Mrs S Biddulph against Inspire Bounce Fitness Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation). It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,333.34.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £6,201.00 in damages. It further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,845.69.
Finally, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £950.00. The hearing listed for 15 October 2019 was cancelled, and the total monetary award set out in the judgment was £14,330.03.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,845.69. | Upheld | — | £1,846 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £950.00. | Upheld | — | £950 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £5,333.34 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £5,333 |
| Breach of contract | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £6,201.00. | Upheld | — | £6,201 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,330
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.