Case 2600407/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Dixon v NJPA Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2600407/2022
- Decision date
- 8 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Pinder
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Dixon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 8 July 2022 before Employment Judge S Pinder sitting alone, the tribunal dealt with the claimant's claims against NJPA Ltd for unlawful deduction of wages. One claim concerned bonus payment(s) and the other concerned holiday pay.
The claim for unlawful deduction of wages relating to bonus payment(s) was dismissed. The written judgment records that, in any event, the claimant did not pursue that claim at the hearing.
The claim for unlawful deduction of wages relating to holiday pay was also dismissed. The judgment records no monetary award and no separate remedy calculation, and written reasons were not provided because reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction of wages in respect of bonus payment(s). The judgment states it was dismissed and adds that, in any event, the claimant did not pursue it at the hearing on 8 July 2022. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction of wages in respect of holiday pay. The judgment states this claim was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.