Case 2600412/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. M Tansey v FM Solutions Group Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2600412/2022
- Decision date
- 29 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. M Tansey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records that, by letter dated 15 April 2023, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.