Case 2600417/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Gee v Hop Pole Retford Ltd In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation — 2019
- Case reference
- 2600417/2019
- Decision date
- 6 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Swann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Gee
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Swann found that the respondent, Hop Pole Retford Ltd in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation, had not presented a response. The tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mr A Gee, was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £248.40 for that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £840.96. No further reasoning, factual findings, or legal tests were set out in the short judgment beyond those two determinations. The total award recorded from the two sums is £1,089.36.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £248.40. | Upheld | — | £248 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £840.96. | Upheld | — | £841 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,089
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.