Case 2600417/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Dr Madeeha Uppal First v Strategic Business Insights Inc Second Respondent: Secretary of State for Business and Trade — 2024
- Case reference
- 2600417/2024
- Decision date
- 29 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phillips
- Venue
- Nottingham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr Madeeha Uppal First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Nottingham on 19 July 2024 before Employment Judge Phillips sitting alone, and with neither respondent attending, the tribunal made brief liability findings in favour of the Claimant against the First Respondent. It found that the First Respondent had failed to pay wages, notice pay, redundancy pay, and holiday pay.
The tribunal ordered the First Respondent to pay gross sums of £1,887.60 for wages, £1,016.40 for notice pay, £2,178 for redundancy pay, and £2,947.56 for holiday pay. It also ordered £450 in respect of loss of statutory rights. The claim against the Second Respondent was adjourned generally.
The written judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No further factual findings or legal analysis are set out in the written record beyond the numbered orders.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says the First Respondent failed to pay the Claimant's wages and awards £1,887.60 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,888 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the First Respondent failed to pay notice pay and awards £1,016.40 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,016 |
| Redundancy | Paragraph 5 states the Claimant was owed redundancy pay; paragraph 6 says the £2,178 award is 'in respect of notice pay', which appears to be a drafting error in the written record. | Upheld | — | £2,178 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment says the First Respondent failed to pay holiday pay and awards £2,947.56 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,948 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,480
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.